Spotlight
“If you don't know where you’re going, you won’t know when you get there” - one of Yogi Berra’s famous pronouncements and Russell Frackman’s favorite. Russ likes to point out it reflects the unintended path his career has taken. He arrived at MSK in 1970, as its 40th lawyer and fresh out of law school, before “intellectual property” existed as a term of reference, and long before many of the laws he’s navigated in his career. He didn’t know it then, but he had “gotten there”.
Russ quickly became the “music man”. From the 8-track to the cassette to CD’s to the internet, changes in the creation, distribution, and consumption of music mirrored the course of his career. This Brooklyn boy, whose mother wanted him to be an accountant, was an unlikely candidate to tackle what would become the most famous modern day case in copyright law. As he likes to point out, he was still getting “comfortable” with e-mail when he dove headfirst into the technology behind Napster and successfully represented the recording industry as lead counsel in its seminal case. Russ approached the case and guided it to a successful conclusion with the same thoughtfulness and thoroughness he had applied to countless cases over his decades of practice.
Those who know Russ describes him as the ultimate nice guy, a personality trait atypical of a successful trial lawyer and a far cry from the colorful nickname he earned in the Napster case - - “Russell the Muscle”. With all of Russ’s success and high profile representation over the years of clients such as The Rolling Stones, Coldplay, Neil Diamond, Jimmy Page, Jack Nicholson, and Paul Newman, he has maintained the same standards that one of his mentors at MSK impressed upon him early in his career: be tough but be fair.
Experience
Legal Expertise
Russell J. Frackman is a partner in the Los Angeles office of Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP. He is recognized as one of the nation’s leading entertainment and intellectual property litigators, having successfully represented clients in a number of landmark cases in state and federal trial and appellate courts. He was lead counsel for the record company plaintiffs in the District Courts and Courts of Appeals in seminal Internet file sharing litigation, A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, 239 F.3d 1004 (9th Cir. 2001) and 284 F.3d 1091 (9th Cir. 2002), In re Aimster Copyright Litigation, 334 F.3d 643 (7th Cir. 2003), and Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, et al. v. Grokster, Ltd, et al., 545 U.S. 913 (2005); counsel in two precedent-setting decisions involving the scope of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), Rossi v. Motion Picture Assn. of America, Inc., 391 F.3d 1000 (9th Cir. 2004), concerning the notice and takedown provisions of the DMCA, and 321 Studios v. MGM, 307 F. Supp. 2d 1085 (N.D. Cal. 2004), concerning the anti-circumvention provisions of the DMCA; and counsel for plaintiffs in Capitol Records, LLC v. Vimeo, LLC, 972 F. Supp. 2d 500 (S.D.N.Y.2013) and 972 F. Supp. 2d 537 (S.D.N.Y.2013) aff’d in part, vacated in part, and remanded for further proceedings, 826 F.3d 78 (2d Cir. 2016), involving the application of the DMCA to a user-generated content website. He also has authored amicus curiae briefs in numerous record industry cases including American Broadcasting v. Aereo, Inc., 573 U.S. 431 (2014), Viacom, Int’l, Inc. v. YouTube, Inc., 676 F.3d 19 (2d Cir. 2012), Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Dimension Films, Inc., 410 F.3d 792 (8th Cir. 2005), Fonovisa, Inc., v. Cherry Auction, Inc., 76 F.3d 529 (9th Cir.1996) and Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. Pandora Media, Inc., No. S240649 (Cal. Sup. Ct. 2017).
Russell Frackman has lectured extensively at law schools and for professional organizations throughout the country. Most recently, he was the Director of the Copyright Amicus Brief Clinic at UCLA School of Law, as well as Chair and a member of the Executive Committee of the Intellectual Property Institute at USC School of Law. He has repeatedly been recognized by Chambers USA, Legal 500, The Hollywood Reporter, Billboard, Variety, and Best Lawyers. He was awarded two Honorary Gold Record Awards by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) for his work on behalf of the record industry. In 2015, Russell Frackman was the recipient of the GRAMMY Foundation® Entertainment Law Initiative Service (ELI) Award in recognition of his demonstrated commitment to advancing and supporting the music community through service.
Representative Matters
- Represented the record company plaintiffs in litigation against Sirius XM Radio, Inc. and Pandora Media, Inc., in precedential cases involving the issue of performance rights under state law for sound recordings “fixed” prior to February 15, 1972 (and therefore ineligible for federal copyright protection).
- Represented the record company plaintiffs in copyright infringement litigation against Amway Corp. and others involving the unauthorized use of hundreds of sound recordings in videos uploaded to and performed over the Internet. (In an earlier case in 1998, Mr. Frackman obtained what was, at the time, the largest civil settlement on behalf of the record industry against Amway Corp. and others in similar litigation for use of sound recordings in videocassettes.)
- On behalf of numerous industry organizations (including, among others, the Recording Industry Association of America, SoundExchange, Inc., the Recording Academy, BMI and ASCAP), filed amicus curiae briefs supporting content providers in the Supreme Court, American Broadcasting v. Aereo, Inc., 573 U.S. 431 (2014); various Courts of Appeals, Fox Television v. Aereokiller, LLC 861 F. 3d 1002 (9th Cir. 2017), Viacom Int’l, Inc. v. YouTube, Inc., 676 F. 3d 19 (2d Cir 2012), Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Dimension Films, 410 F. 3d 792 (6th Cir. 2005), United States v. Moghdam, 175 F. 3d 1269 (11th Cir. 1999), Fonovisa, Inc. v. Cherry Auction, Inc., 76 F.3d 529 (9th Cir. 1996); District Courts, Viacom Int’l., Inc. v. YouTube, 718 F. Supp 2nd 514 (S.D. N.Y. 2010); Tur v. YouTube, Inc., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50254 (C.D. Cal., June 20, 2007), and state courts, Flo&Eddie, Inc. v. Pandora Media, Inc., S240649 (Cal. Supreme Court 2017), State v. Awawdeh, 72 Wash. App. 373 (1994).
- Obtained a “precedential” opinion sustaining, on both likelihood of confusion and dilution grounds, an opposition to the registration of a trademark infringing the world-famous “Motown” trademark. UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Mattel, Inc. 100 U.S.P.Q.2.d 1868 (TTAB 2011).
- Represented as lead counsel several record companies in obtaining affirmance of a contempt citation and permanent injunction enjoining the auction of thousands of infringing recordings. A&M Records, Inc., et al v. LaMonte, et al, 366 Fed. App’x. 736, (9th Cir. 2010).
- Obtained a preliminary injunction against, and then a summary judgment holding liable, an online company that provided digital “simulations” of thousands of commercial recordings (including virtually all of The Beatles recordings) as lead counsel in an important case of first impression involving the scope of rights in sound recordings under § 114 of the Copyright Act in Capitol Records, LLC, et al v. Bluebeat, Inc., 765 F. Supp. 2d 1198 (C.D. Cal 2010).
- Obtained summary judgment for defendant on audit claims based on contractual limitations provisions. Clinton v. Universal Music Group, 2011 WL 3501818 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2011).
- Counsel for defendant in E.S.S. Entertainment 2000, Inc. v. Rock Star Videos, 547 F.3d 1095 (9th Cir. 2008), involving First Amendment issues concerning the use of trademarks in video games.
- Obtained summary judgment dismissing for lack of standing a copyright action against Jay-Z, Linkin Park, and others, holding plaintiff did not possess an exclusive copyright interest. Nafal v. Carter, 540 F. Supp. 2d 1128 (C.D. Cal 2007), aff’d 2010 WL 2852571 (9th Cir. July 21, 2010).
- Counsel for record company and music publisher defendants in more than 100 related copyright infringement cases arising from the alleged unauthorized “sampling” of musical compositions and sound recordings, including several cases in the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. WB Music, Inc., 520 F.3d 588 (6th Cir. 2008); Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. WB Music Corp. 508 F.3d 394 (6th Cir. 2007); Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Universal-MCA Music Publ., 481 F. 3d 926 (6th Cir. 2007); Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Rhyme Syndicate Music, Inc., 376 F. 3d 615 (6th Cir. 2004); Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. DJ Yella Muzick, 99 Fed. Appx 686 (6th Cir. 2004).
- Counsel for plaintiff in claim for copyright infringement against search engine “image search” function, Perfect 10 v. Google, Inc., 416 F. Supp. 2d 828 (C.D. Cal 2006), aff’d. in part and rev’d. in part, 487 F.3d 701 (9th Cir. 2007).
- Obtained summary judgment defending an infringement claim brought against a record company client and involving a hit recording of the rap artist 50 Cent, Lil’ Joe Wein Music, Inc. v. Jackson, 2006 U.S. Dist. Lexis 78367 (S.D. Fla. October 27, 2006), aff’d., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19165, 2007 WL 2274519 (11th Cir., August 8, 2007).
- Represented defendant in litigation involving pre-emption of right of publicity claims based on use of recording artist’s voice fixed in a sound recording. Laws v. Sony Music Entertainment, Inc. 448 F. 3d 1134 (9th Cir. 2006).
- Represented defendant in trademark infringement and unfair competition action seeking damages and injunction involving the hit recording “Barbie Girl.” Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc. 296 F.3d 894 (9th Cir. 2002).
Honors & Awards
- "IP Star," Managing IP, 2020
- Senior Statesmen in Media & Entertainment: Litigation, California, Chambers USA (2018-2022); Band 1 in Media & Entertainment: Litigation California, Chambers USA (2017)
- “Hall of Fame” in Intellectual Property - Copyright, Legal 500 (2017); “Leading Individual” in Intellectual Property - Copyright, Legal 500 (2017 & 2018)
- Recipient of the GRAMMY Foundation® 2015 Entertainment Law Initiative Service (ELI) Award in recognition of his demonstrated commitment to advancing and supporting the music community through service.
- Initial recipient of the Donald E. Biederman Legacy Award presented by the Entertainment Media Law Institute of Southwestern Law School which recognizes a member of the bench or bar who upholds the highest standard of ethics and professionalism as a leader in entertainment and media law.
- “California Lawyer Attorney of the Year” (CLAY Award) in Intellectual Property, California Lawyer (2001)
- “Entertainment Lawyer of the Year” (2001), the Beverly Hills Bar Association
- The “Most Influential Lawyers of the Decade,” the National Law Journal (2010)
- “100 Lawyers Who Helped Shape a Decade,” Los Angeles Daily Journal (2010); “Top 10 California Entertainment IP Litigators,” Daily Journal(2008); “75 Leading Intellectual Property Litigators in California,” Daily Journal (2011, 2012)
- “Top 100 Most Influential Lawyers in America,” California Law Business
- “Los Angeles' Top 50 Litigators,” Los Angeles Business Journal; “Who's Who in Entertainment Law,” Los Angeles Business Journal (2012); “Who's Who in Intellectual Property Law,” Los Angeles Business Journal (2012); “Los Angeles’ Top 100 Lawyers, Top Media and Entertainment Attorneys,” Los Angeles Business Journal (2009)
- Recognized by Best Lawyers in America© in:
- Entertainment Law - Motion Pictures and Television (2006-2025)
- Entertainment Law - Music Litigation (2006-2025)
- “Lawyer of the Year” (2013, 2015, 2018, and 2024)
- Litigation - Intellectual Property (2006-2024)
- “Lawyer of the Year” (2014 and 2018)
- “The Lawdragon 500 Leading Lawyers in America” (2010)
- “Top Music Lawyers,” Billboard (2017, 2018, 2021)
- “Power Lawyer; Top 100” The Hollywood Reporter
- “Hollywood Law Impact List,” Variety
- “Top 5% of lawyers in Southern California,” Southern California Super Lawyers (2004-2023)
- Recipient of two honorary Gold Record Awards from the Recording Industry Association of America for litigation on behalf of the record industry
- AV® Preeminent™ Rating, Martindale-Hubbell
Headlines
Headlines
- August 15, 2024
- August 17, 2023
- January 10, 2023
- Chambers USA, June 1, 2022
- January 20, 2022
- June 9, 2021
- Chambers USA, May 20, 2021
- April 5, 2021
- Super Lawyers Magazine , January 2021
- January 21, 2021
- August 20, 2020
- July 27, 2020
- May 2020
- Chambers USA , April 23, 2020
- August 15, 2019
- May 29, 2019
- April 25, 2019
- January 30, 2019
- October 19, 2018
- August 15, 2018
- May 30, 2018
- May 3, 2018
- August 15, 2017
- July 17, 2017
- May 31, 2017
- May 26, 2017
- January 20, 2017
- December 15, 2016
- August 22, 2016
- July 15, 2016
- May 31, 2016
- April 20, 2016
- March 29, 2016
- February 18, 2016
- January 20, 2016
- October 22, 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- July 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- February 2, 2015
- November 21, 2014
- August 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- January 2014
- August 15, 2013
- August 15, 2013
- May 2013
- March 25, 2013
- January 2013
- November 1, 2012
- October 26, 2012
- September 15, 2012
- August 24, 2012
- July 18, 2012
- June 25, 2012
- June 18, 2012
- April 26, 2012
- April 13, 2012
- January 23, 2012
- August 31, 2011
- July 13, 2011
- June 10, 2011
- June 9, 2011
- April 7, 2011
- January 25, 2011
- October 12, 2010
- Daily Journal Names Russell Frackman Among "Ten California Lawyers Who Helped Shape the Past Decade"September 2010
- August 24, 2010
- August 19, 2010
- July 16, 2010
- July 1, 2010
- March 29, 2010
- February 4, 2010
- January 26, 2010
- December 31, 2009
- December 14, 2009
- October 5, 2009
- August 3, 2009
- The Hollywood Reporter Recognizes Bill Cole and Russell Frackman to its List of 2009 "Power Lawyers"July 29, 2009
- April 16, 2009
- January 30, 2009
- November 21, 2008
- September 17, 2008
- July 23, 2008
- June 18, 2008
- June 17, 2008
- January 30, 2008
- January 8, 2008
- January 5, 2008
- December 28, 2007
- August 20, 2007
- August 6, 2007
- July 20, 2007
- June 15, 2007
- September 21, 2006
- June 19, 2006
- September 19, 2005
- June 2002
- March 11, 2002
- October 29, 2001
Publications
- World Trademark Review, October 2010
- 2001
- February 1993
- The Failure to Pay Wages and Termination of Entertainment Contracts in California: Some Implications of the Labor Code
Events & Speaking Engagements
- May 28, 2020
- June 21, 2017
- USC Gould School of Law l 2017 Intellectual Property InstituteMarch 21, 2017
- California Copyright ConferenceNovember 15, 2016
- October 17, 2015
- October 14, 2015
- September 17, 2015
- May 21, 2014
- December 14, 2011
- July 2011
- October 13, 2010
- Video Game Content and Third Party IP: The Intersection of First Amendment, Copyright and TrademarksMay 22, 2010
- March 23, 2010
- January 6, 2010
- October 22, 2009
- March 17, 2009
- Make it Available at Your Own Risk: A Look Into Copyright Infringement by Digital Distribution2009
- November 8, 2008
- September 4, 2008
- January 7, 2008
- Sony v. Universal: The Betamax Decision Twenty Years Hence2004
- October 14, 2001
Admissions
- California, 1971
- U.S. District Court
- Central District of California, 1971
- Eastern District of California, 1984
- Northern District of California, 1980
- U.S. Court of Appeals
- Second Circuit, 1980
- Ninth Circuit, 1971
- U.S. Supreme Court, 1980
Education
Columbia Law School, J.D., 1970; cum laude
Member, Board of Editors, Columbia Law Review
Northwestern University, B.A., 1967